TA1-25548
The claimant's evidence was found not credible and he failed to produce corroborating police or bank documentation and did not rebut the presumption that Hungarian authorities can provide adequate protection; therefore the claim fails under sections 96 and 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
- Citation
- TA1-25548
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister (Canada)
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Refugee claim rejected
- Legal Topics
- State Protection, Credibility, Police Corruption, Money Laundering, Burden of Proof, Sections 96 and 97 IRPA
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Minister (Canada)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was credible about being forced off the road and robbed
- 2 Whether unauthorized deposits and money laundering targeting the claimant occurred
- 3 Whether the claimant reported the incidents to police and presented documentary evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's evidence was found not credible and he failed to produce corroborating police or bank documentation and did not rebut the presumption that Hungarian authorities can provide adequate protection; therefore the claim fails under sections 96 and 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
Court Disposition
Refugee claim rejected
Orders
- Refugee claim dismissed; no protection granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment