TA6-06707

TA6-06707

The tribunal found on the evidence — arrests, detention, prosecutions, and contemporaneous country reports showing KPS/UNMIK effectiveness — that Kosova has provided and will provide adequate, though imperfect, protection; the claimant's allegations of state collusion lacked credibility; therefore the refugee claim is rejected under sections 96 and 97 IRPA.

Citation
TA6-06707
Parties
Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister (Canada)
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
3 April 2007
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Decision (refugee Protection Division)
Outcome
Claim rejected
Legal Topics
State Protection, Blood Feud/reprisal, Credibility Findings, Prosecution and Policing, Application of Sections 96 and 97 IRPA
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXXX XXXXX

Claimant

Minister (Canada)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Decision (refugee Protection Division)

  1. 1 Whether the state of Kosova is unwilling or unable to provide adequate protection
  2. 2 Whether the claimant's allegations of state collusion and special connections are credible
  3. 3 Whether the claimant faces a well-founded fear of persecution due to a blood feud

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found on the evidence — arrests, detention, prosecutions, and contemporaneous country reports showing KPS/UNMIK effectiveness — that Kosova has provided and will provide adequate, though imperfect, protection; the claimant's allegations of state collusion lacked credibility; therefore the refugee claim is rejected under sections 96 and 97 IRPA.

Court Disposition

Claim rejected

Orders

  • Refugee claim rejected pursuant to sections 96 and 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act