MB5-05577
The claim is rejected because the panel found the claimant's credibility undermined by a significant omission in his BOC, and the risk he faces from the Maras is a generalized, non-Convention-ground-based criminal risk to the population of El Salvador, therefore failing to establish persecution under ss.96 or 97(1) IRPA; Article 1E did not apply to bar consideration of the claim.
- Citation
- MB5-05577
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister (Citizenship and Immigration Canada)
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Claim rejected
- Legal Topics
- Refugee Protection, Credibility Assessment, Convention Nexus, Generalized Risk, Temporary Protected Status (tps), Article 1 E Exclusion
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant
Minister (Citizenship and Immigration Canada)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant qualifies for refugee protection under ss.96 and 97(1) of the IRPA
- 2 Whether claimant's evidence is credible given omissions in the Basis of Claim form
- 3 Whether the harm feared is connected to a Convention ground
Ratio Decidendi
The claim is rejected because the panel found the claimant's credibility undermined by a significant omission in his BOC, and the risk he faces from the Maras is a generalized, non-Convention-ground-based criminal risk to the population of El Salvador, therefore failing to establish persecution under ss.96 or 97(1) IRPA; Article 1E did not apply to bar consideration of the claim.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected
Orders
- Claim rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment