MA8-08339
The claimant's testimony was found not credible due to multiple contradictions, implausibilities and absence of corroborating evidence; accordingly she failed to discharge the legal burden to establish a serious possibility of persecution or, on the balance of probabilities, the risks required to be a person in need of protection, and the claim was rejected.
- Citation
- MA8-08339
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Determination (hearing and Decision)
- Outcome
- Refugee protection claim rejected; claimant not a refugee and not a person in need of protection
- Legal Topics
- Domestic Violence, Credibility, State Protection, Unlawful Departure, Travel Documents, Guidelines on Women Refugee Claimants
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Determination (hearing and Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is a refugee by membership in a particular social group (female victims of conjugal violence)
- 2 Whether claimant was persecuted by her ex-husband
- 3 Whether claimant could obtain state protection in Mexico
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's testimony was found not credible due to multiple contradictions, implausibilities and absence of corroborating evidence; accordingly she failed to discharge the legal burden to establish a serious possibility of persecution or, on the balance of probabilities, the risks required to be a person in need of protection, and the claim was rejected.
Court Disposition
Refugee protection claim rejected; claimant not a refugee and not a person in need of protection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment