TA2-21195

TA2-21195

Claim rejected because claimant was found not credible and failed to document or reliably prove alleged past persecution tied to running a stall; the harm alleged is generalized criminality lacking nexus to a Convention ground and adequate state protection is available; therefore she is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.

Citation
TA2-21195
Parties
Claimant: XXX XXXXX XXXXXXX; Respondent: Minister
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
2 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision (merits Hearing)
Outcome
Claim dismissed — claimant is not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection.
Legal Topics
Ethnic Persecution, Political Opinion, State Protection, Credibility, Documentation, Risk to Life, Torture, Cruel and Unusual Treatment, Delay / Re‑availment, Nexus
Source Language
English
Immigration and Refugee Law Administrative Law Human Rights Ethnic Persecution Political Opinion State Protection Credibility Documentation +5 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXX XXXXX XXXXXXX

Claimant

Minister

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision (merits Hearing)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether claimant is a Convention refugee with a well‑founded fear of persecution for a Convention ground
  2. 2 Whether claimant is a person in need of protection (risk to life, risk of cruel and unusual treatment or danger of torture)
  3. 3 Credibility of claimant and truthfulness of documentary evidence

Ratio Decidendi

Claim rejected because claimant was found not credible and failed to document or reliably prove alleged past persecution tied to running a stall; the harm alleged is generalized criminality lacking nexus to a Convention ground and adequate state protection is available; therefore she is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed — claimant is not a Convention refugee and not a person in need of protection.