MA6-01394

MA6-01394

The claimant failed to prove a particularized risk as required by s.97(1)(b)(ii) because the evidence established the threat from gangs was a generalized, countrywide risk; therefore the claim for refugee protection is rejected.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
MA6-01394
Parties
Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
29 August 2006
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Oral Decision (hearing Aug 23, 2006; Decision Aug 29, 2006)
Outcome
Claim for refugee protection rejected
Legal Topics
Protection Under S.97(1)(b) of IRPA, Generalized Risk Vs. Particularized Risk, Gang Violence (mara Salvatrucha), Burden of Proof
Source Language
english
Immigration Law Refugee Law Administrative Law Protection Under S.97(1)(b) of IRPA Generalized Risk Vs. Particularized Risk Gang Violence (mara Salvatrucha) Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX

Claimant

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Oral Decision (hearing Aug 23, 2006; Decision Aug 29, 2006)

  1. 1 Whether the claimant faces a personal risk to life or risk of cruel and unusual treatment under s.97(1)(b) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
  2. 2 Whether the risk alleged is particular to the claimant or is a generalized risk faced by the population of El Salvador
  3. 3 Whether threats from gangs (Mara Salvatrucha) amount to a risk that is not faced generally by other individuals from that country

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to prove a particularized risk as required by s.97(1)(b)(ii) because the evidence established the threat from gangs was a generalized, countrywide risk; therefore the claim for refugee protection is rejected.

Court Disposition

Claim for refugee protection rejected

Orders

  • Claim for refugee protection rejected