TA4-11950

TA4-11950

Claim dismissed because claimant failed to establish identity or country of reference; key identity documents (RIC and Hukou) contained material inconsistencies and omissions and claimant's explanations were not credible; as a result, no serious possibility of persecution or sufficient grounds to believe torture on...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
TA4-11950
Parties
Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (Canada)
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
8 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim (rpd) / Hearing and Final Decision (refugee Protection Division)
Outcome
Claim rejected; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection
Legal Topics
Identity Documents, Credibility Assessment, Convention Refugee Definition, Risk of Torture (cat), Burden of Proof, Document Authenticity
Source Language
english
Immigration Refugee Law Administrative Law Identity Documents Credibility Assessment Convention Refugee Definition Risk of Torture (cat) Burden of Proof +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXXX XXXXX

Claimant

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (Canada)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim (rpd) / Hearing and Final Decision (refugee Protection Division)

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's identity and country of reference were established
  2. 2 Whether the identity documents proffered were authentic and acceptable
  3. 3 Whether the claimant's testimony was credible

Ratio Decidendi

Claim dismissed because claimant failed to establish identity or country of reference; key identity documents (RIC and Hukou) contained material inconsistencies and omissions and claimant's explanations were not credible; as a result, no serious possibility of persecution or sufficient grounds to believe torture on return was established, so refugee protection and protection under CAT are denied.

Court Disposition

Claim rejected; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection

Orders

  • Refugee protection claim dismissed by RPD