Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Ogunmefun

Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Ogunmefun

The appeal was dismissed as moot because the respondent had been granted permanent residence and, given the respondent's failure to appear or file a factum, the Court declined to exercise its discretion to hear the moot appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2001 FCA 329
Parties
Applicant: MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION; Respondent: FOLARIN OGUNMEFUN
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
31 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal / Judgment on Appeal (mootness)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for mootness.
Legal Topics
Mootness, Judicial Discretion, Permanent Residence
Source Language
en
Immigration Law Administrative Law Justiciability Mootness Judicial Discretion Permanent Residence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Applicant

FOLARIN OGUNMEFUN

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal / Judgment on Appeal (mootness)

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is moot because the respondent has been granted permanent residence
  2. 2 Whether the Court should exercise its discretion to hear a moot appeal in the absence of the respondent's notice of appearance and factum

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed as moot because the respondent had been granted permanent residence and, given the respondent's failure to appear or file a factum, the Court declined to exercise its discretion to hear the moot appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for mootness.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed for mootness.
  • Court declines to exercise discretion to hear the appeal on its merits due to lack of respondent participation.