TB6-11912
The claimants failed to establish nexus to a Convention ground and, on the evidence, the harm feared is a generalized risk associated with criminal gang activity in Colombia rather than a personalized risk under s.97(1); therefore they are not persons in need of protection.
- Citation
- TB6-11912
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Designated Representative: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister of Immigration
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection (irpa Ss.96 and 97(1)) / Decision (reasons and Decision)
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimants are not persons in need of protection.
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Section 97 Generalized Risk, Child Refugee Claimants, Criminal Gang Recruitment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Designated Representative
Minister of Immigration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection (irpa Ss.96 and 97(1)) / Decision (reasons and Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is nexus to a Convention ground for refugee protection
- 2 Whether the risk is personalized or a generalized risk under section 97(1) IRPA
- 3 Credibility of claimant and witnesses
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants failed to establish nexus to a Convention ground and, on the evidence, the harm feared is a generalized risk associated with criminal gang activity in Colombia rather than a personalized risk under s.97(1); therefore they are not persons in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimants are not persons in need of protection.
Orders
- Claim rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment