TB5-09496
The panel found the claimant's core allegation undermined by inconsistent and unreliable documentary evidence and implausible explanations for failing to correct or authenticate those documents, and alternatively found a reasonable internal flight alternative to Sulamaniyah; therefore the claimant did not meet the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- TB5-09496
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister of Immigration
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Re Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee or person in need of protection.
- Legal Topics
- Credibility, Internal Flight Alternative, Convention Refugee Status, Documentary Evidence, Burden of Proof, Protection Claim Procedure
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant
Minister of Immigration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Re Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Credibility of claimant testimony
- 2 Authenticity and consistency of documentary evidence
- 3 Availability of internal flight alternative
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found the claimant's core allegation undermined by inconsistent and unreliable documentary evidence and implausible explanations for failing to correct or authenticate those documents, and alternatively found a reasonable internal flight alternative to Sulamaniyah; therefore the claimant did not meet the balance of probabilities required for refugee protection or protection from risk of serious harm.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee or person in need of protection.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment