TB6-14085

TB6-14085

The panel rejected the claimants' allegations as not credible based on inconsistencies with prior statements and visa applications, inadequate and unreliable documentary proof of residence and employment, suspicious documentary presentation, and unexplained delay in leaving Iraq; documentary and country evidence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
TB6-14085
Parties
Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister of Immigration (Canada)
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Hearing and Decision (reasons)
Outcome
Claims rejected; claimants are not Convention refugees and not persons in need of protection
Legal Topics
Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection, Credibility Assessment, Internal Flight Alternative, Persecution on Grounds of Religion
Source Language
english
Immigration Law Refugee Law Human Rights Convention Refugee Person in Need of Protection Credibility Assessment Internal Flight Alternative Persecution on Grounds of Religion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Claimant

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Claimant

Minister of Immigration (Canada)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Hearing and Decision (reasons)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimants are Convention refugees
  2. 2 Whether the claimants are persons in need of protection
  3. 3 Whether the claimants' evidence of residence and persecution is credible

Ratio Decidendi

The panel rejected the claimants' allegations as not credible based on inconsistencies with prior statements and visa applications, inadequate and unreliable documentary proof of residence and employment, suspicious documentary presentation, and unexplained delay in leaving Iraq; documentary and country evidence show safety in the KRI/XXXX such that an internal flight alternative exists; therefore on the balance of probabilities they are neither Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.

Court Disposition

Claims rejected; claimants are not Convention refugees and not persons in need of protection

Orders

  • The refugee protection claims are rejected.