VB9-01953
The claimants have access to Colombian citizenship by birth and acquisition via mere formalities; they failed to demonstrate significant impediments or reasonable efforts to acquire that citizenship; their asserted risks in Colombia are speculative and general rather than personal; therefore they are not Convention refugees under s.96 nor persons in need of protection under s.97 of the Act.
- Citation
- VB9-01953
- Parties
- Claimant (principal): XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Claimant (associate): XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Claimant (minor): XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister of Immigration
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Hearing and Final Decision (rpd Decision)
- Outcome
- Claims rejected by the Refugee Protection Division; claimants are neither Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.
- Legal Topics
- Country of Reference, Access to Foreign Citizenship, Adjournment and Disclosure (ndp), Credibility and Forward Looking Risk, Section 96 Convention Refugee, Section 97 Person in Need of Protection
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant (principal)
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant (associate)
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant (minor)
Minister of Immigration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Hearing and Final Decision (rpd Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants have access to Colombian citizenship (country of reference)
- 2 Whether claimants face a serious possibility of persecution in Colombia on a Convention ground
- 3 Whether claimants face a personal risk under s.97 of the IRPA in Colombia
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants have access to Colombian citizenship by birth and acquisition via mere formalities; they failed to demonstrate significant impediments or reasonable efforts to acquire that citizenship; their asserted risks in Colombia are speculative and general rather than personal; therefore they are not Convention refugees under s.96 nor persons in need of protection under s.97 of the Act.
Court Disposition
Claims rejected by the Refugee Protection Division; claimants are neither Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.
Orders
- Refugee protection claims of the claimants are rejected (no protection granted)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment