2021 RLLR 34

2021 RLLR 34

Member accepted claimant's credibility and identity as a trans man, found documentary and country evidence established a serious possibility of persecution throughout Bahrain, concluded claimant rebutted presumption of state protection with clear and convincing evidence, found no viable internal flight alternative,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2021 RLLR 34
Parties
Claimant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship (Canada)
Court
Royal Canadian Mounted Police Labour Relations
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
5 February 2021
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection (convention Refugee Claim Under Irpa) / Oral Hearing and Decision (member Rendered Oral Reasons)
Outcome
Claim allowed; claimant found to be a Convention refugee
Legal Topics
Gender Identity, Particular Social Group, State Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Credibility and Evidence, Use of SOGIE Guidelines
Source Language
en
Immigration and Refugee Law Human Rights Law Administrative Law Gender Identity Particular Social Group State Protection Internal Flight Alternative Credibility and Evidence +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX

Claimant

Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship (Canada)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection (convention Refugee Claim Under Irpa) / Oral Hearing and Decision (member Rendered Oral Reasons)

  1. 1 Whether claimant is a member of a particular social group (trans man)
  2. 2 Whether claimant has a well‑founded fear of persecution in Bahrain
  3. 3 Whether state protection in Bahrain is available and effective

Ratio Decidendi

Member accepted claimant's credibility and identity as a trans man, found documentary and country evidence established a serious possibility of persecution throughout Bahrain, concluded claimant rebutted presumption of state protection with clear and convincing evidence, found no viable internal flight alternative, and therefore claimant qualifies as a Convention refugee.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed; claimant found to be a Convention refugee

Orders

  • Convention refugee protection granted
  • IRB record updated to reflect claimant's chosen name and pronouns per SOGIE Guidelines