TA8-00525
The panel found the claimant's evidence of PSB interest and the summons not credible and unsupported by country evidence specific to Fujian; although the claimant is a genuine Christian, the documentary record does not establish a serious possibility of persecution on return, therefore the claim is rejected.
- Citation
- TA8-00525
- Parties
- Claimant: XXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister (Respondent)
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision (refugee Protection Division)
- Outcome
- Claim rejected; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection, Credibility Assessment, Freedom of Religion, Summons/warrant Authenticity, Country of Origin Information
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXX XXXX
Claimant
Minister (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision (refugee Protection Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Authenticity of police summons and documentation
- 2 Credibility of claimant's account of PSB inquiries and arrests
- 3 Genuineness of claimant's Christian faith and activities
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found the claimant's evidence of PSB interest and the summons not credible and unsupported by country evidence specific to Fujian; although the claimant is a genuine Christian, the documentary record does not establish a serious possibility of persecution on return, therefore the claim is rejected.
Court Disposition
Claim rejected; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment