TA8-00525

TA8-00525

The panel found the claimant's evidence of PSB interest and the summons not credible and unsupported by country evidence specific to Fujian; although the claimant is a genuine Christian, the documentary record does not establish a serious possibility of persecution on return, therefore the claim is rejected.

Citation
TA8-00525
Parties
Claimant: XXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister (Respondent)
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
31 January 2011
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision (refugee Protection Division)
Outcome
Claim rejected; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.
Legal Topics
Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection, Credibility Assessment, Freedom of Religion, Summons/warrant Authenticity, Country of Origin Information
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXX XXXX

Claimant

Minister (Respondent)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision (refugee Protection Division)

  1. 1 Authenticity of police summons and documentation
  2. 2 Credibility of claimant's account of PSB inquiries and arrests
  3. 3 Genuineness of claimant's Christian faith and activities

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found the claimant's evidence of PSB interest and the summons not credible and unsupported by country evidence specific to Fujian; although the claimant is a genuine Christian, the documentary record does not establish a serious possibility of persecution on return, therefore the claim is rejected.

Court Disposition

Claim rejected; claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection.