TB1-10419
The panel concluded that the claimant's central allegations were not credible and lacked corroboration, the claimant failed to establish a subjective fear reasonably founded in objective evidence, and adequate state protection was available in El Salvador; therefore the claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection under IRPA.
- Citation
- TB1-10419
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX et al.; Respondent: Minister (Respondent)
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection (irpa) / Decision (refugee Protection Division)
- Outcome
- Refugee claim rejected
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, State Protection, Credibility and Corroboration, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX et al.
Claimant
Minister (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection (irpa) / Decision (refugee Protection Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is a Convention refugee
- 2 Whether claimant is a person in need of protection under s.97(1) IRPA
- 3 Credibility of claimant's account and corroboration
Ratio Decidendi
The panel concluded that the claimant's central allegations were not credible and lacked corroboration, the claimant failed to establish a subjective fear reasonably founded in objective evidence, and adequate state protection was available in El Salvador; therefore the claimant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection under IRPA.
Court Disposition
Refugee claim rejected
Orders
- Refugee Protection Division rejects the claimants' claims for refugee protection; claimants are not Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment