TB6-06115
The adult female claimant has access to Sudanese citizenship by marriage and failed to establish a significant impediment under Tretsetsang; objective country evidence does not corroborate that Palestinians or those with non-'Sudani' appearance face persecution in Sudan; testimony was speculative and uncorroborated; therefore none of the six claimants have a well-founded fear of persecution or meet the subsection 97(1) protection threshold, and all claims are dismissed under sections 96 and 97(1) IRPA.
- Citation
- TB6-06115
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Claimant: XXXX XXXX; Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister (Respondent)
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Decision Following Oral Hearing
- Outcome
- All six protection claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Convention Refugee, Person in Need of Protection, Country of Reference, Citizenship, Well Founded Fear of Persecution, Burden of Proof and Corroboration
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant
XXXX XXXX
Claimant
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Claimant
Minister (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Decision Following Oral Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Country of reference for the adult female claimant (Sudan v Syria)
- 2 Whether the claimants are Convention refugees
- 3 Whether the claimants are persons in need of protection under section 97(1) IRPA
Ratio Decidendi
The adult female claimant has access to Sudanese citizenship by marriage and failed to establish a significant impediment under Tretsetsang; objective country evidence does not corroborate that Palestinians or those with non-'Sudani' appearance face persecution in Sudan; testimony was speculative and uncorroborated; therefore none of the six claimants have a well-founded fear of persecution or meet the subsection 97(1) protection threshold, and all claims are dismissed under sections 96 and 97(1) IRPA.
Court Disposition
All six protection claims dismissed
Orders
- All six claims for protection are dismissed; no protection granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment