TC1-18271
The RAD confirmed the RPD decision: on the balance of probabilities the Los Zetas do not have a presence or sufficient motivation to pursue the Appellants to Durango and, even accepting the Los Zetas have means to locate persons, relocation to the city of Durango would not be objectively unreasonable in all the circumstances; therefore a viable IFA exists and the Appellants are not Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.
- Citation
- TC1-18271
- Parties
- Principal Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Associate Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Minor Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister (Respondent)
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Appeal (refugee Appeal Division) / Decision on Appeal (rad Confirming RPD Decision)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Internal Flight Alternative, Convention Refugee, Section 97(1) Risk, Extortion, Nexus to Convention Grounds, Standard of Review (correctness)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Principal Appellant
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Associate Appellant
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Minor Appellant
Minister (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal (refugee Appeal Division) / Decision on Appeal (rad Confirming RPD Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a viable Internal Flight Alternative (IFA) exists in the city of Durango
- 2 Whether Los Zetas have the means to locate and the motivation to pursue the Appellants to the IFA
- 3 Whether the Appellants' fear has a nexus to a Convention ground
Ratio Decidendi
The RAD confirmed the RPD decision: on the balance of probabilities the Los Zetas do not have a presence or sufficient motivation to pursue the Appellants to Durango and, even accepting the Los Zetas have means to locate persons, relocation to the city of Durango would not be objectively unreasonable in all the circumstances; therefore a viable IFA exists and the Appellants are not Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; RPD decision confirmed
Orders
- Pursuant to section 111(1)(a) IRPA, the appeal is dismissed and the RPD decision dated October 25, 2021 is confirmed.
- No new evidence admitted and no oral hearing ordered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment