TC0-09774
The incomplete recording of the RPD hearing resulted in an inadequate record that deprived the appellants of procedural fairness; because the missing testimony was central to credibility and findings on risk and internal flight, the RAD could not confirm or substitute the RPD's findings and therefore allowed the appeal and referred the matter back to the RPD for redetermination by a differently constituted panel under IRPA s.111(1)(c).
- Citation
- TC0-09774
- Parties
- Appellants: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister (Respondent)
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (irpa) / Appeal to the Refugee Appeal Division (rad) From Refugee Protection Division (rpd) Decision; RAD Decision to Allow Appeal and Refer Matter Back to RPD for Redetermination
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; matter referred back to the Refugee Protection Division for redetermination by a differently constituted panel.
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Fairness, Incomplete Hearing Record, Remittal/referral, Gender Based Persecution, Internal Flight Alternative, Credibility Findings, Statutory Interpretation of IRPA Provisions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX
Appellants
Minister (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (irpa) / Appeal to the Refugee Appeal Division (rad) From Refugee Protection Division (rpd) Decision; RAD Decision to Allow Appeal and Refer Matter Back to RPD for Redetermination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the incomplete recording of the RPD hearing breached the appellants' right to procedural fairness
- 2 Whether the record is adequate to permit the RAD to confirm or substitute the RPD's findings on risk and credibility
- 3 Whether the risk alleged is a generalized risk under section 97 IRPA and whether the minor faces gender-based persecution under section 96 IRPA
Ratio Decidendi
The incomplete recording of the RPD hearing resulted in an inadequate record that deprived the appellants of procedural fairness; because the missing testimony was central to credibility and findings on risk and internal flight, the RAD could not confirm or substitute the RPD's findings and therefore allowed the appeal and referred the matter back to the RPD for redetermination by a differently constituted panel under IRPA s.111(1)(c).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; matter referred back to the Refugee Protection Division for redetermination by a differently constituted panel.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Request for an oral hearing before the RAD denied.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment