TB6-05115

TB6-05115

The claim fails because the Panel found the claimant's testimony and supporting documents riddled with inconsistencies and unreasonable explanations, undermining credibility and corroboration such that the claimant did not meet the legal thresholds for a serious possibility of persecution or for protection under s.97(1).

Citation
TB6-05115
Parties
Claimant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister
Court
Refugee Protection Division
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
10 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Merits Hearing and Decision
Outcome
Claim rejected
Legal Topics
Sexual Orientation Persecution, Domestic Violence, Credibility Assessment, Safe Third Country Agreement, Gender Guidelines
Source Language
English
Immigration Refugee Law Administrative Law Sexual Orientation Persecution Domestic Violence Credibility Assessment Safe Third Country Agreement Gender Guidelines

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XXXX XXXX XXXX

Claimant

Minister

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refugee Protection Claim / Merits Hearing and Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether claimant is a Convention refugee
  2. 2 whether claimant is a person in need of protection under s.97(1) IRPA
  3. 3 credibility and consistency of claimant's evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The claim fails because the Panel found the claimant's testimony and supporting documents riddled with inconsistencies and unreasonable explanations, undermining credibility and corroboration such that the claimant did not meet the legal thresholds for a serious possibility of persecution or for protection under s.97(1).

Court Disposition

Claim rejected

Orders

  • Claimant's claim for refugee protection is rejected
  • No protection granted under ss.97(1)(a) or 97(1)(b) of the IRPA