TB8-12192
The appeal is dismissed because the appellants failed to rebut the presumption of state protection in Austria on the balance of probabilities; objective evidence in the National Documentation Package demonstrates adequate state protection for victims of domestic violence and the majority of new materials were inadmissible or did not alter that conclusion.
- Citation
- TB8-12192
- Parties
- Principal Appellant: XXXX XXXX; Associate Appellant: XXXX XXXX XXXX; Associate Appellant: XXXX XXXX; Respondent: Minister; Designated Representative: XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Appeal / RAD Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; decision of RPD confirmed
- Legal Topics
- State Protection, Domestic Violence, Battered Women's Syndrome, Admissibility of New Evidence, Standard of Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Principal Appellant
XXXX XXXX XXXX
Associate Appellant
XXXX XXXX
Associate Appellant
Minister
Respondent
XXXX XXXX
Designated Representative
Procedural Posture
Refugee Appeal / RAD Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants rebutted the presumption of state protection in Austria
- 2 Admissibility of evidence submitted after the RPD decision
- 3 Whether a claimed medical condition (Battered Women's Syndrome) made it objectively unreasonable to seek state protection
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the appellants failed to rebut the presumption of state protection in Austria on the balance of probabilities; objective evidence in the National Documentation Package demonstrates adequate state protection for victims of domestic violence and the majority of new materials were inadmissible or did not alter that conclusion.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; decision of RPD confirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Decision of the Refugee Protection Division dated April 23, 2018 is confirmed; appellants are not Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment