MA7-03958
The panel found material contradictions in the claimant's narrative and testimony and concluded, on the evidence and country reports, that kidnappings and gang violence in Haiti are generalized risks not particularized by social status or gender; therefore the claimants failed to establish persecution under s.96 or a personal, particularized risk under s.97, and the claims were rejected.
- Citation
- MA7-03958
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX; Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX; Designated Representative: XXXXX XXXXX; Panel: Me Donal Archambault; Respondent: Minister's Counsel
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection / Person in Need of Protection / Oral Hearing and Decision (oral Reasons)
- Outcome
- All claims for refugee protection and for determination as persons in need of protection are rejected.
- Legal Topics
- Refugee Protection, Person in Need of Protection, Political Opinion, Membership in a Particular Social Group, Violence Against Women, Kidnapping/ransom, Credibility Assessment, Generalized Vs Particularized Risk
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
XXXXX XXXXX
Designated Representative
Me Donal Archambault
Panel
Minister's Counsel
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection / Person in Need of Protection / Oral Hearing and Decision (oral Reasons)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants are Convention refugees under section 96 IRPA
- 2 Whether claimants are persons in need of protection under section 97 IRPA
- 3 Whether risk of kidnapping/ransom constitutes persecution or a particularized risk
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found material contradictions in the claimant's narrative and testimony and concluded, on the evidence and country reports, that kidnappings and gang violence in Haiti are generalized risks not particularized by social status or gender; therefore the claimants failed to establish persecution under s.96 or a personal, particularized risk under s.97, and the claims were rejected.
Court Disposition
All claims for refugee protection and for determination as persons in need of protection are rejected.
Orders
- The claim for refugee protection filed by XXXXX XXXXX is rejected for lack of evidence concerning one listed individual.
- The refugee protection claims and protection claims of all named claimants are rejected by the panel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment