Reference re Milgaard (Can.)

Reference re Milgaard (Can.)

Because the Court's conclusions on the Reference, the federal Attorney General's order for a new trial and the provincial Attorney General's stay changed the justice context, the interests of justice no longer required summary treatment of Mr. Wilson's alleged misconduct under oath; the Court therefore stayed its contempt proceedings and left the question of prosecution to the appropriate prosecutorial authorities.

Citation
[1992] 1 SCR 875
Parties
Citizen Cited for Contempt/witness: Ronald Wilson; Referrer of the Reference: Governor in Council; Party (ordered New Trial): Attorney General of Canada; Party (entered Stay of Proceedings): Attorney General for Saskatchewan
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
4 June 1992
Procedural Posture
Reference Pursuant to S.53 Supreme Court Act / Citation for Contempt in the Course of a Reference; Contempt Proceedings Stayed
Outcome
Contempt proceedings against Ronald Wilson stayed.
Legal Topics
Miscarriage of Justice, Perjury, Stay of Proceedings, Prosecutorial Discretion, Reference to Supreme Court
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ronald Wilson

Citizen Cited for Contempt/witness

Governor in Council

Referrer of the Reference

Attorney General of Canada

Party (ordered New Trial)

Attorney General for Saskatchewan

Party (entered Stay of Proceedings)

Procedural Posture

Reference Pursuant to S.53 Supreme Court Act / Citation for Contempt in the Course of a Reference; Contempt Proceedings Stayed

  1. 1 Whether the conduct of Ronald Wilson under oath in the Reference constituted contempt/perjury requiring summary adjudication
  2. 2 Whether the admission of new evidence and orders concerning a new trial and the provincial stay alter the appropriateness of summary contempt proceedings
  3. 3 Whether the decision to prosecute should be left to prosecutorial authorities

Ratio Decidendi

Because the Court's conclusions on the Reference, the federal Attorney General's order for a new trial and the provincial Attorney General's stay changed the justice context, the interests of justice no longer required summary treatment of Mr. Wilson's alleged misconduct under oath; the Court therefore stayed its contempt proceedings and left the question of prosecution to the appropriate prosecutorial authorities.

Court Disposition

Contempt proceedings against Ronald Wilson stayed.

Orders

  • Stay of contempt proceedings against Ronald Wilson
  • Decision whether to prosecute left to appropriate prosecutorial authorities