WS v Canada Employment Insurance Commission
The claimant was suspended and dismissed for failing to comply with the employer's vaccination policy, the claimant was aware of the policy and consequences, and that failure constitutes wilful misconduct under the EI Act so the claimant is disentitled/disqualified for the specified periods; the tribunal lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the policy's reasonableness.
- Citation
- 2022 SST 1572
- Parties
- Appellant (claimant): W. S.; Respondent (commission): Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 6 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance / General Division Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Misconduct, Vaccination Policy, Disentitlement, Disqualification, Jurisdictional Limits
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W. S.
Appellant (claimant)
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent (commission)
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance / General Division Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the Claimant suspended and dismissed because of misconduct?
- 2 Whether the tribunal can assess the reasonableness of the employer's vaccination policy
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant was suspended and dismissed for failing to comply with the employer's vaccination policy, the claimant was aware of the policy and consequences, and that failure constitutes wilful misconduct under the EI Act so the claimant is disentitled/disqualified for the specified periods; the tribunal lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the policy's reasonableness.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Claimant disentitled from EI benefits from 2021-11-28 to 2021-12-31
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment