Fleet v. Federated Life Insurance Company of Canada
The court found the evidence did not establish that the deceased insured made a material misrepresentation to Federated Life; expert handwriting and admissions established the agent forged the insured's signature and did not reasonably ask or record the required medical information; Federated Life therefore failed to discharge the onus of proving misrepresentation and must pay the $150,000 benefit to the beneficiary; Federated Life in turn is entitled to judgment against its agent Bellefontaine for the same amount for breach of duty in submitting the application.
- Citation
- 2008 NSSC 231
- Parties
- Plaintiff/beneficiary: David Richard K. Fleet; Defendant/insurer: Federated Life Insurance Company of Canada; Defendant/agent/cross Defendant: Paul Bellefontaine
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Insurance Dispute (life Insurance, Agency and Misrepresentation) / Trial Judgment (supreme Court of Nova Scotia)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff Fleet against Federated Life for $150,000; judgment for Federated Life against agent Bellefontaine for $150,000; claim by Fleet against Bellefontaine dismissed; prejudgment interest and costs reserved for further written submissions.
- Legal Topics
- Misrepresentation, Material Non Disclosure, Forgery/signature, Agent Fiduciary Duty, Use of Discovery Transcript, Prejudgment Interest, Credibility Assessment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Richard K. Fleet
Plaintiff/beneficiary
Federated Life Insurance Company of Canada
Defendant/insurer
Paul Bellefontaine
Defendant/agent/cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Insurance Dispute (life Insurance, Agency and Misrepresentation) / Trial Judgment (supreme Court of Nova Scotia)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased insured made material misrepresentations or failed to disclose material facts to the insurer
- 2 Whether the insurer proved misrepresentation or non-disclosure sufficient to avoid the policy
- 3 Whether the agent, Bellefontaine, signed the insureds' applications without authorization
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the evidence did not establish that the deceased insured made a material misrepresentation to Federated Life; expert handwriting and admissions established the agent forged the insured's signature and did not reasonably ask or record the required medical information; Federated Life therefore failed to discharge the onus of proving misrepresentation and must pay the $150,000 benefit to the beneficiary; Federated Life in turn is entitled to judgment against its agent Bellefontaine for the same amount for breach of duty in submitting the application.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff Fleet against Federated Life for $150,000; judgment for Federated Life against agent Bellefontaine for $150,000; claim by Fleet against Bellefontaine dismissed; prejudgment interest and costs reserved for further written submissions.
Orders
- Judgment for $150,000 plus prejudgment interest to be paid by Federated Life to David Fleet (beneficiary).
- Judgment for $150,000 plus prejudgment interest to be paid by Paul Bellefontaine to Federated Life (insurer).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment