R. v. W.H.A.
The judge dismissed the mistrial motion because jurors had just taken their oaths and had not heard evidence, the accused would not remain restrained during the remainder of the trial, and established authorities support that an explicit, clear instruction reiterating the presumption of innocence and reliance only on evidence will cure any prejudice from jurors having seen shackles.
- Citation
- 2011 NSSC 167
- Parties
- Prosecution: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: W. H. A.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Jury Selection Motion for Mistrial
- Outcome
- Motion to declare mistrial dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Mistrial, Restraints on Accused, Presumption of Innocence, Jury Instructions, Shackling
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Prosecution
W. H. A.
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Jury Selection Motion for Mistrial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether visible shackles on the accused during jury selection required a mistrial
- 2 Whether the accused may be restrained in the courtroom without a prior hearing demonstrating reasonable grounds
- 3 Whether a trial judge's instruction can cure any prejudice arising from jurors seeing the accused shackled
Ratio Decidendi
The judge dismissed the mistrial motion because jurors had just taken their oaths and had not heard evidence, the accused would not remain restrained during the remainder of the trial, and established authorities support that an explicit, clear instruction reiterating the presumption of innocence and reliance only on evidence will cure any prejudice from jurors having seen shackles.
Court Disposition
Motion to declare mistrial dismissed
Orders
- Motion to declare mistrial dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment