M.L.D. v. British Columbia (Children and Family Development)
The Further Amended Notice of Civil Claim was dismissed because it failed to plead the essential elements of defamation with necessary particulars (no clear words, no publication to third parties in several instances, and non-defamatory content), and the negligence claim lacked causation as the plaintiff knew the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2015 BCSC 405
- Parties
- Plaintiff: M.L.D.; Defendant (crown Defendants): Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia (Ministry of Children and Family Development), Bernadine Lee, Darren DeRoon, Wendy Boden, Alick Troup; Defendant (sunshine Coast Defendants): Sunshine Coast Community Services Society; workers Jen Davey, Wesley Darragh-Bullen, Deanna Cartea
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Tort Action (defamation and Negligence) Arising From Foster Care Relationship / Application to Strike/dismiss Pleadings (rule 9 5) Following Prior Strike Decision; Final Disposition on Strike Applications
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claims against the Sunshine Coast Defendants and the Crown Defendants are dismissed for failing to disclose a reasonable cause of action; defendants awarded costs on Scale B.
- Legal Topics
- Strike Application, Publication Requirement in Defamation, Particulars Requirement (rule 3 7(21)(a)), Causation, Duty to Disclose Child History, Misfeasance Allegation, Freedom of Information Documents
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M.L.D.
Plaintiff
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia (Ministry of Children and Family Development), Bernadine Lee, Darren DeRoon, Wendy Boden, Alick Troup
Defendant (crown Defendants)
Sunshine Coast Community Services Society; workers Jen Davey, Wesley Darragh-Bullen, Deanna Cartea
Defendant (sunshine Coast Defendants)
Procedural Posture
Civil Tort Action (defamation and Negligence) Arising From Foster Care Relationship / Application to Strike/dismiss Pleadings (rule 9 5) Following Prior Strike Decision; Final Disposition on Strike Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Further Amended Notice of Civil Claim discloses a reasonable cause of action in defamation against the Crown and Sunshine Coast defendants
- 2 Whether the pleadings plead publication and defamatory meaning with required particulars
- 3 Whether the negligence claim against Crown defendants establishes causation and loss attributable to non-disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The Further Amended Notice of Civil Claim was dismissed because it failed to plead the essential elements of defamation with necessary particulars (no clear words, no publication to third parties in several instances, and non-defamatory content), and the negligence claim lacked causation as the plaintiff knew the youth's history before the closure; consequently the claims disclosed no reasonable cause of action and were dismissed under the plain-and-obvious test.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claims against the Sunshine Coast Defendants and the Crown Defendants are dismissed for failing to disclose a reasonable cause of action; defendants awarded costs on Scale B.
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim against the Sunshine Coast Defendants dismissed.
- Plaintiff's claims against the Crown Defendants dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment