R.W. v. K.W.

R.W. v. K.W.

Permission to relocate was granted because there was a material change in circumstances, the father's move was reasonable and motivated by genuine financial necessity that outweighed transitional disruption, the children’s best interests are served by improved financial stability combined with conditions to protect parental contact and child safety; joint custody is continued with the father as primary caregiver during transition and specific conditions are imposed to ensure ongoing contact and mitigate risks related to alcohol and parental responsibilities.

Citation
2015 NSSC 267
Parties
Applicant (father): R. W.; Respondent (mother): K. W.
Court
Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 September 2015
Procedural Posture
Family Mobility/custody / Supreme Court Decision on Mobility Application (permission to Relocate)
Outcome
Permission granted for the father to relocate to Ontario with the children; joint custody continued with father as primary caregiver during transition; relocation conditional on compliance with specified requirements to protect children and facilitate contact with mother.
Legal Topics
Mobility Application, Joint Custody, Primary Caregiver, Best Interests of the Child, Parenting Time and Access, Conditions on Relocation, Financial Hardship Impact on Custody, Alcohol Counselling Requirement, Use of Technology for Contact
Source Language
English
Family Law Child Custody and Access Mobility/relocation Domestic Relations Addiction and Rehabilitation Mobility Application Joint Custody Primary Caregiver +6 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R. W.

Applicant (father)

K. W.

Respondent (mother)

Procedural Posture

Family Mobility/custody / Supreme Court Decision on Mobility Application (permission to Relocate)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the father may relocate the children to Ontario
  2. 2 Whether the children should remain with the father as primary caregiver or return to the mother
  3. 3 Whether the proposed move is in the best interests of the children balancing financial necessity against disruption to attachments

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to relocate was granted because there was a material change in circumstances, the father's move was reasonable and motivated by genuine financial necessity that outweighed transitional disruption, the children’s best interests are served by improved financial stability combined with conditions to protect parental contact and child safety; joint custody is continued with the father as primary caregiver during transition and specific conditions are imposed to ensure ongoing contact and mitigate risks related to alcohol and parental responsibilities.

Court Disposition

Permission granted for the father to relocate to Ontario with the children; joint custody continued with father as primary caregiver during transition; relocation conditional on compliance with specified requirements to protect children and facilitate contact with mother.

Orders

  • Continue joint custody with father as primary caregiver during transition
  • Father permitted to relocate children to Ontario