R. v. Ali

R. v. Ali Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2004-11-12 Docket numbers C29740 Judges Catzman, Marvin Adrian; Laskin, John Ivan; Blair, Robert Ashley Subject Criminal Decision Content DATE: 20041112 DOCKET: C29740 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO RE: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Respondent) – and – MOHAMED RAFEEK ALI (Appellant) BEFORE: CATZMAN, LASKIN and BLAIR JJ.A. COUNSEL: Joseph Di Luca for the appellant Brian McNeely for the respondent HEARD & RELEASED ORALLY: November 10, 2004 On appeal from the conviction of Justice E.B. Minden dated April 15, 1998. ENDORSEMENT [1] On behalf of the appellant, Mr. Di Luca submits that the trial judge made two errors, namely: (i) that he applied the wrong legal test in assessing the scope and effect of the contact with the jury by focussing exclusively on whether the interference resulted in actual bias and failing to consider whether the interference was sufficient to raise a reasonable apprehension of bias; and (ii) that he failed to conduct an inquiry of at least one, if not all, of the jurors with whom the officer had contact. [2] As to the first ground, a review of the transcript where this issue was considered makes it clear that the trial judge was alive to the requirement to dispel a reasonable apprehension of bias. His instructions to the jurors confirmed this. Accordingly, we would not give effect to this ground of appeal. [3] With respect to the second ground of appeal, we see no error in principle on the part of the trial judge in exercising his discretion not to examine the juror or jurors in the circumstances, particularly, given the position of defence counsel that nothing untoward had occurred. [4] Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. “M.A. Catzman J.A.” “John Laskin J.A.” “R.A. Blair J.A.”