Nadeau Poultry Farm - Order refusing Westco's request to adjourn the sentencing hearing pending the determination of its appeal from the Tribunal's contempt Order

Nadeau Poultry Farm - Order refusing Westco's request to adjourn the sentencing hearing pending the determination of its appeal from the Tribunal's contempt Order

The Tribunal refused Westco's adjournment request because s.9(2) mandates expedition of Tribunal proceedings, the prevailing criminal law principle disfavors postponing sentence pending appeal, and Westco failed to provide convincing reasons to depart from that rule; accordingly the sentencing hearing was scheduled...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2010 Comp Trib 3
Parties
Applicant: Nadeau Ferme Avicole Limitée / Nadeau Poultry Farm Limited; Respondent: Groupe Westco Inc.; Groupe Dynaco, Coopérative Agroalimentaire; Volailles Acadia S.E.C.; Volailles Acadia Inc. / Acadia Poultry Inc.
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 February 2010
Procedural Posture
Refusal to Deal – Interim Order Under the Competition Act (s.75; S.104) / Adjournment Request Regarding Sentencing Hearing Pending Appeal From Tribunal Contempt Order (pre‑sentencing Scheduling)
Outcome
Request to adjourn the sentencing hearing refused; sentencing hearing scheduled to proceed
Legal Topics
Refusal to Deal, Contempt, Adjournment, Sentencing, Interim Order
Source Language
en
Competition Law Tribunal Procedure Administrative Law Refusal to Deal Contempt Adjournment Sentencing Interim Order

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nadeau Ferme Avicole Limitée / Nadeau Poultry Farm Limited

Applicant

Groupe Westco Inc.; Groupe Dynaco, Coopérative Agroalimentaire; Volailles Acadia S.E.C.; Volailles Acadia Inc. / Acadia Poultry Inc.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Refusal to Deal – Interim Order Under the Competition Act (s.75; S.104) / Adjournment Request Regarding Sentencing Hearing Pending Appeal From Tribunal Contempt Order (pre‑sentencing Scheduling)

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing hearing should be adjourned pending determination of Westco's appeal from the Tribunal's Contempt Order
  2. 2 Application of Competition Tribunal Act s.9(2) duty to deal with proceedings informally and expeditiously
  3. 3 Whether Westco provided convincing reasons to depart from the general rule against postponing sentence pending appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal refused Westco's adjournment request because s.9(2) mandates expedition of Tribunal proceedings, the prevailing criminal law principle disfavors postponing sentence pending appeal, and Westco failed to provide convincing reasons to depart from that rule; accordingly the sentencing hearing was scheduled to proceed.

Court Disposition

Request to adjourn the sentencing hearing refused; sentencing hearing scheduled to proceed

Orders

  • Westco’s request for an adjournment of the sentencing hearing is refused.
  • Sentencing hearing to be held at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, April 29, 2010 and Friday, April 30, 2010 in the Hearing Room of the Competition Tribunal, 600-90 Sparks Street, Ottawa.