Allen v. Cross Country Enterprises Inc.

Allen v. Cross Country Enterprises Inc.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal because there was ample evidence to support the trial judge's factual finding that the appellant was an independent contractor, and factual findings supported by evidence should not be disturbed on appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2007 ONCA 534
Parties
Appellant: Natasha Allen; Respondent: Cross Country Enterprises Inc.; Respondent: Hugh McMaster; Respondent: Francoise McMaster
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 July 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Independent Contractor Status, Employment Relationship, Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Employment Law Independent Contractor Status Employment Relationship Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Natasha Allen

Appellant

Cross Country Enterprises Inc.

Respondent

Hugh McMaster

Respondent

Francoise McMaster

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal (court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in finding the plaintiff was an independent contractor rather than an employee
  2. 2 Whether the appeal court should overturn the trial judge's factual findings

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal because there was ample evidence to support the trial judge's factual finding that the appellant was an independent contractor, and factual findings supported by evidence should not be disturbed on appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Costs to the respondents fixed at $10,000, all inclusive