Confederation Life Association v. Borden
Appeal allowed and trial judgment restored because the jury findings on the limited questions submitted were supported by the evidence and the provincial court's grant of a new trial on the ground the verdict was against the weight of evidence was an error subject to appellate reversal; additionally, appellate consideration is confined to grounds raised below and the defences purportedly discharging the sureties were not pleaded or found by the jury.
- Citation
- (1904) 34 SCR 338
- Parties
- Appellant / Plaintiff: Confederation Life Association; Respondents / Defendants (sureties): Frederick W. Borden and Others
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 1904
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia to the Supreme Court of Canada
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment for plaintiff restored; order of Supreme Court of Nova Scotia ordering a new trial set aside.
- Legal Topics
- New Trial, Weight of Evidence, Fidelity Bond, Non Disclosure to Surety, Retention of Agent, Burden of Proof, Appellate Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Confederation Life Association
Appellant / Plaintiff
Frederick W. Borden and Others
Respondents / Defendants (sureties)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia to the Supreme Court of Canada
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a provincial court's order granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence is an exercise of discretion immune from appellate interference
- 2 Whether the plaintiff's conduct (retention of agent after defaults, alleged secret arrangement to apply commissions to past indebtedness, deviations from remittance instructions and advances of commissions) discharged the sureties under the fidelity bond
- 3 Whether the appellate court may consider new factual grounds not raised below
Ratio Decidendi
Appeal allowed and trial judgment restored because the jury findings on the limited questions submitted were supported by the evidence and the provincial court's grant of a new trial on the ground the verdict was against the weight of evidence was an error subject to appellate reversal; additionally, appellate consideration is confined to grounds raised below and the defences purportedly discharging the sureties were not pleaded or found by the jury.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment for plaintiff restored; order of Supreme Court of Nova Scotia ordering a new trial set aside.
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Judgment for the plaintiff (Confederation Life Association) restored; order for new trial set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment