TC2-09027
The RPD was correct to find the claims arose from a property dispute lacking nexus to a Convention ground; the newly admitted police document did not create a serious credibility issue; appellants can reasonably be expected to relinquish pursuit of the disputed land and therefore do not face a forward-looking risk under s.97 IRPA; appeal dismissed.
- Citation
- TC2-09027
- Parties
- Principal Appellant: XXXX XXXX; Associate Appellant: XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Appeal Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Appeal / Appeal to Refugee Appeal Division Reasons and Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; decision of the Refugee Protection Division confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Nexus to Refugee Convention, Particular Social Group, New Evidence Admission Under S.110(4) IRPA, Forward Looking Risk Under S.97 IRPA, Property/land Disputes, Requirement to Relinquish Claim
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX
Principal Appellant
XXXX XXXX
Associate Appellant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Appeal / Appeal to Refugee Appeal Division Reasons and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants established a nexus to a Convention ground
- 2 Whether new evidence met s.110(4) IRPA and should be admitted
- 3 Whether appellants face a forward-looking risk under s.97 IRPA
Ratio Decidendi
The RPD was correct to find the claims arose from a property dispute lacking nexus to a Convention ground; the newly admitted police document did not create a serious credibility issue; appellants can reasonably be expected to relinquish pursuit of the disputed land and therefore do not face a forward-looking risk under s.97 IRPA; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; decision of the Refugee Protection Division confirmed
Orders
- New police document admitted as evidence with the appeal
- No oral hearing convened
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment