R. v. Tran

R. v. Tran

The appeal was allowed on consent; the conviction was quashed and an acquittal entered by the Court of Appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2018 ONCA 35
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Nguyen Son Tran
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
23 January 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Allowed on Consent
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; acquittal entered.
Legal Topics
Acquittal, Conviction Quashed, Consent Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Appeal Acquittal Conviction Quashed Consent Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Nguyen Son Tran

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Allowed on Consent

  1. 1 Whether the conviction should be quashed
  2. 2 Whether an acquittal should be entered following consent of the Crown

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was allowed on consent; the conviction was quashed and an acquittal entered by the Court of Appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; acquittal entered.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed on consent
  • Conviction quashed