North Atlantic Marine Supplies & Services Inc. v. Hickey
The Court found special circumstances based on absence of delay, limited voluntary collections against a sizable judgment, the appellant's adverse corporate status and significant corporate changes resulting in no local real estate, and concluded there was a reasonable prospect the appellant could not pay costs;...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2020 NLCA 22
- Parties
- Applicant: North Atlantic Marine Supplies & Services Inc.; Respondent: Louise Hickey
- Court
- Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (court of Appeal of Newfoundland and Labrador) / Application for Security for Costs Under Rule 43 (memorandum of Disposition)
- Outcome
- Application for security for costs granted.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Rule 43 Court of Appeal Rules, Stay of Execution, Corporate Status and Good Standing
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North Atlantic Marine Supplies & Services Inc.
Applicant
Louise Hickey
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (court of Appeal of Newfoundland and Labrador) / Application for Security for Costs Under Rule 43 (memorandum of Disposition)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether special circumstances exist to order security for costs under Rule 43
- 2 Whether the appellant is likely unable to pay costs if ordered
- 3 Appropriate quantum of security for costs
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found special circumstances based on absence of delay, limited voluntary collections against a sizable judgment, the appellant's adverse corporate status and significant corporate changes resulting in no local real estate, and concluded there was a reasonable prospect the appellant could not pay costs; accordingly the Court exercised its discretion to order security for costs in the amount and on the timeline specified.
Court Disposition
Application for security for costs granted.
Orders
- Security for costs in the amount of $8,700 to be paid by July 17, 2020; failure to pay will result in the appeal being deemed abandoned
- Respondent to file her factum and any portions of the transcript relied upon by September 3, 2020
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR Citation: North Atlantic Marine Supplies & Services Inc. v. Hickey, 2020 NLCA 22 Date: June 29, 2020 Docket Number: 201901H0101 BETWEEN: NORTH ATLANTIC MARINE SUPPLIES & SERVICES INC. APPLICANT AND: LOUISE HICKEY RESPONDENT Coram: Butler J.A. Court Appealed From: Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador General Division 201701G8454 Application Heard: June 29, 2020 Decision Rendered: June 29, 2020 (Orally) Memorandum of Disposition Filed: June 29, 2020 Counsel for the Applicant: Sarah Fitzgerald Counsel for the Respondent: Peter O'Flaherty Q.C. Page 2 MEMORANDUM OF DISPOSITION Butler J.A.: [1] This was an application by Ms. Hickey for security for costs pursuant to Rule 43 of the Court of Appeal Rules NLR 38/16 which states: 43. (1) Security for costs shall not be required in an appeal unless, upon application, by reason of special circumstances, security is ordered by the Court. (2) Unless the Court otherwise orders, an appellant who fails to give security for costs as ordered shall be deemed to have abandoned the appeal and the respondent is entitled to costs. [2] As the transcript reflects, I was satisfied that special circumstances were established. With the guidance provided by this Court’s decision in NPV Management Ltd. v. Anthony, 2007 NLCA 66, the key features of this case are: (1) There has been no delay in Ms. Hickey’s request for security for costs; (2) On a judgment (including costs and interest) of approximately $120,000, Ms. Hickey has collected approximately $22,000 over a period of five months. No payments were made voluntarily; (3) The Appellant is a federally incorporated company which last filed records at the Provincial Registry of Companies in 2016. It is not in good standing in this Province despite registration of a recent easement agreement; (4) The Appellant has had significant corporate changes. While many occurred before the Summary Trial was held, the effect is that it now has no real estate in this jurisdiction. [3] I was therefore satisfied that there is a reasonable prospect that the Appellant would or could not pay costs if ordered by this Court and that it is unfair to Ms. Hickey to incur further legal expense on this appeal. [4] As to quantum, Ms. Hickey’s draft bill of costs estimated counsel fees on the appeal between $5,200 (Column 3) and $8,700 (Column 5). Counsel fees make up the bulk of the estimated total costs between $6,700 and $10,700. Estimated total costs for Column 4 would total $8,700 and I concluded were justified by: Page 3 • the amount in issue (approximately $100,000); • the fact that the Appellant had made no voluntary payments; • without a stay of execution, the Appellant must understand the requirement that it pay an outstanding judgment; and • Ms. Hickey’s counsel has 30 years at the bar and qualifies as senior counsel. [5] I ordered security for costs in the amount of $8,700 to be paid by July 17, 2020 failing which the appeal would be deemed abandoned. [6] I ordered Ms. Hickey file her factum and any portions of the transcript on which she relies by September 3, 2020 following which counsel shall advise the Registry of dates when they are available for the hearing of the appeal. [7] In light of the change in the Appellant’s name, I ordered that the style of cause on a go forward basis should refer to the Appellant as: North Atlantic Marine Supplies & Services Inc. now known as North Atlantic Offshore Inc. [8] I awarded Ms. Hickey her taxed costs of the Rule 43 application on Column 3. _______________________________________ G. D. Butler J.A.