Warman v. Northern Alliance

Warman v. Northern Alliance

The Tribunal will defer the hearing on the constitutional validity of ss.13, 54(1) and 54(1.1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act until the outcome of Warman v. Lemire to avoid inconsistent findings, excessive cost and to allow guidance from that proceeding; the hearing will proceed solely on the evidence regarding...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2008 CHRT 14
Parties
Complainant: Richard Warman; Commission: Canadian Human Rights Commission; Respondent: Northern Alliance; Respondent: Jason Ouwendyk
Court
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
8 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Complaint Under the Canadian Human Rights Act / Procedural Ruling: Hearing on Allegations to Proceed; Constitutional Challenge Deferred Pending Lemire Outcome
Outcome
Hearing on complaint allegations to proceed now; hearing on constitutional validity of impugned sections deferred pending outcome of Warman v. Lemire; subpoenas and subpoena motion not decided at this time; no remedial orders to be issued if complaint is substantiated until courts determine the constitutional question.
Legal Topics
Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, Charter Challenge, Deferral/stay of Proceedings, Subpoena for Witnesses
Source Language
english
Constitutional Law Human Rights Law Administrative Law Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act Charter Challenge Deferral/stay of Proceedings Subpoena for Witnesses

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Warman

Complainant

Canadian Human Rights Commission

Commission

Northern Alliance

Respondent

Jason Ouwendyk

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Human Rights Complaint Under the Canadian Human Rights Act / Procedural Ruling: Hearing on Allegations to Proceed; Constitutional Challenge Deferred Pending Lemire Outcome

  1. 1 Whether ss.13, 54(1) and 54(1.1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act are constitutionally applicable, valid and operative
  2. 2 Whether those provisions violate ss.2(a), 2(b), 2(d) and 7 of the Charter and are justified under s.1
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal should hear the constitutional issue together with the merits or defer it pending the Lemire proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal will defer the hearing on the constitutional validity of ss.13, 54(1) and 54(1.1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act until the outcome of Warman v. Lemire to avoid inconsistent findings, excessive cost and to allow guidance from that proceeding; the hearing will proceed solely on the evidence regarding the complaint's allegations and no remedial orders will be issued until the courts finally determine the constitutional question.

Court Disposition

Hearing on complaint allegations to proceed now; hearing on constitutional validity of impugned sections deferred pending outcome of Warman v. Lemire; subpoenas and subpoena motion not decided at this time; no remedial orders to be issued if complaint is substantiated until courts determine the constitutional question.

Orders

  • Proceed with the hearing solely on the evidence regarding the complaint's allegations.
  • Defer the hearing on the constitutional validity of ss.13, 54(1) and 54(1.1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act pending the outcome in Warman v. Lemire.