Warman v. Northern Alliance
The Tribunal will defer the hearing on the constitutional validity of ss.13, 54(1) and 54(1.1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act until the outcome of Warman v. Lemire to avoid inconsistent findings, excessive cost and to allow guidance from that proceeding; the hearing will proceed solely on the evidence regarding...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2008 CHRT 14
- Parties
- Complainant: Richard Warman; Commission: Canadian Human Rights Commission; Respondent: Northern Alliance; Respondent: Jason Ouwendyk
- Court
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Human Rights Complaint Under the Canadian Human Rights Act / Procedural Ruling: Hearing on Allegations to Proceed; Constitutional Challenge Deferred Pending Lemire Outcome
- Outcome
- Hearing on complaint allegations to proceed now; hearing on constitutional validity of impugned sections deferred pending outcome of Warman v. Lemire; subpoenas and subpoena motion not decided at this time; no remedial orders to be issued if complaint is substantiated until courts determine the constitutional question.
- Legal Topics
- Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, Charter Challenge, Deferral/stay of Proceedings, Subpoena for Witnesses
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Warman
Complainant
Canadian Human Rights Commission
Commission
Northern Alliance
Respondent
Jason Ouwendyk
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Complaint Under the Canadian Human Rights Act / Procedural Ruling: Hearing on Allegations to Proceed; Constitutional Challenge Deferred Pending Lemire Outcome
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether ss.13, 54(1) and 54(1.1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act are constitutionally applicable, valid and operative
- 2 Whether those provisions violate ss.2(a), 2(b), 2(d) and 7 of the Charter and are justified under s.1
- 3 Whether the Tribunal should hear the constitutional issue together with the merits or defer it pending the Lemire proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal will defer the hearing on the constitutional validity of ss.13, 54(1) and 54(1.1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act until the outcome of Warman v. Lemire to avoid inconsistent findings, excessive cost and to allow guidance from that proceeding; the hearing will proceed solely on the evidence regarding the complaint's allegations and no remedial orders will be issued until the courts finally determine the constitutional question.
Court Disposition
Hearing on complaint allegations to proceed now; hearing on constitutional validity of impugned sections deferred pending outcome of Warman v. Lemire; subpoenas and subpoena motion not decided at this time; no remedial orders to be issued if complaint is substantiated until courts determine the constitutional question.
Orders
- Proceed with the hearing solely on the evidence regarding the complaint's allegations.
- Defer the hearing on the constitutional validity of ss.13, 54(1) and 54(1.1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act pending the outcome in Warman v. Lemire.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment