Ocean Equities Ltd. v. Colley

Ocean Equities Ltd. v. Colley

The lease was a yearly tenancy with anniversary date June 1; no valid three-month notice was given on or before March 1, 2005 so the lease automatically renewed on June 1, 2005; the landlord failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that the tenant herself contravened an enactment or that her conduct posed a risk to safety or security sufficient to justify short notice under s.10(7A); therefore the Residential Tenancies Officer's decision was correct and termination was not warranted.

Citation
2005 NSSM 33
Parties
Landlord/appellant: Ocean Equities Limited; Tenant/respondent: Ramona Colley
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
30 August 2005
Procedural Posture
Residential Tenancy Appeal (small Claims Court) / Appeal Hearing/decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; decision of Residential Tenancies Officer dated August 3, 2005 upheld
Legal Topics
Notice to Quit, Anniversary Date, Automatic Renewal, Short Notice for Safety/security, Burden of Proof
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ocean Equities Limited

Landlord/appellant

Ramona Colley

Tenant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Residential Tenancy Appeal (small Claims Court) / Appeal Hearing/decision

  1. 1 What type of tenancy existed (fixed, monthly, yearly)?
  2. 2 Was three months notice given prior to anniversary date?
  3. 3 Was short notice justified under s.10(7A) for risk to safety or security?

Ratio Decidendi

The lease was a yearly tenancy with anniversary date June 1; no valid three-month notice was given on or before March 1, 2005 so the lease automatically renewed on June 1, 2005; the landlord failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that the tenant herself contravened an enactment or that her conduct posed a risk to safety or security sufficient to justify short notice under s.10(7A); therefore the Residential Tenancies Officer's decision was correct and termination was not warranted.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; decision of Residential Tenancies Officer dated August 3, 2005 upheld

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Residential Tenancies Officer's decision upheld