NsC Corporation Ltd. v. ABN Amro Bank Canada

NsC Corporation Ltd. v. ABN Amro Bank Canada

The court denied the adjournments because prior orders barred Mr. Black from representing NsC, NsC had ample time (approximately 7.5 months) to retain counsel, and the stated reasons for adjournment were insufficient; the court prioritized bringing the proceedings to resolution.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
1993 NSCA 164
Parties
Applicant: NsC Corporation Limited; Respondent: ABN Amro Bank Canada; Respondent: Ernst & Young Inc.; Respondent: Boyne Clarke; Respondent: Krupp Maschinenbau GmbH; Respondent: Krupp MaK Diesel Inc.
Court
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 September 1993
Procedural Posture
Application for Adjournment and Application for Leave to Appeal / Oral Reasons in Court of Appeal Denying Adjournments; Leave Application Pending
Outcome
Applications for adjournments denied.
Legal Topics
Adjournment, Leave to Appeal, Corporate Representation, Right to Counsel, In Forma Pauperis
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appellate Practice Corporate Law Adjournment Leave to Appeal Corporate Representation Right to Counsel In Forma Pauperis

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

NsC Corporation Limited

Applicant

ABN Amro Bank Canada

Respondent

Ernst & Young Inc.

Respondent

Boyne Clarke

Respondent

Krupp Maschinenbau GmbH

Respondent

Krupp MaK Diesel Inc.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Adjournment and Application for Leave to Appeal / Oral Reasons in Court of Appeal Denying Adjournments; Leave Application Pending

  1. 1 Whether a director/shareholder may personally represent a corporation after a court order prohibiting such representation
  2. 2 Whether an adjournment of scheduled appellate proceedings should be granted given prior orders and elapsed time
  3. 3 Whether impecuniosity excuses non‑compliance with prior orders requiring counsel for a corporation

Ratio Decidendi

The court denied the adjournments because prior orders barred Mr. Black from representing NsC, NsC had ample time (approximately 7.5 months) to retain counsel, and the stated reasons for adjournment were insufficient; the court prioritized bringing the proceedings to resolution.

Court Disposition

Applications for adjournments denied.

Orders

  • Applications for adjournments denied.