1076586 Alberta Ltd. v. Octagon Properties Ltd.
Rescission was not available because Stoneset did not plead or prove fraud, delayed and elected not to seek rescission (laches), and the contract placed due diligence obligations on Stoneset; Stoneset failed to prove negligent misrepresentation on a balance of probabilities; accordingly the assignee (1076586) is not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2014 BCSC 268
- Parties
- Petitioner: 1076586 Alberta Ltd.; Respondent: Octagon Properties Ltd.; Respondent: Marco DeDominicis; Respondent: Stoneset Equities Ltd.; Respondent: BKDI Architects; Respondent: Hayesborne Holdings Inc.; Respondent: Colin Lawson; Respondent: Stoneset One Mortgage Corporation
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Foreclosure; Mortgage Enforcement (vendor Take Back Mortgage) / Summary Trial Application Under Rule 9 7 for Order Nisi of Foreclosure With Shortened Redemption Period
- Outcome
- Judgment for petitioner 1076586 Alberta Ltd.; Order Nisi of foreclosure granted with a shortened redemption period and costs to 1076586 and the trust beneficiaries at Scale B.
- Legal Topics
- Foreclosure, Rescission, Misrepresentation, Assignment of Mortgage, Set Off, Laches, Summary Trial Procedure, Order Nisi, Redemption Period, Conduct of Sale
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
1076586 Alberta Ltd.
Petitioner
Octagon Properties Ltd.
Respondent
Marco DeDominicis
Respondent
Stoneset Equities Ltd.
Respondent
BKDI Architects
Respondent
Hayesborne Holdings Inc.
Respondent
Colin Lawson
Respondent
Stoneset One Mortgage Corporation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Foreclosure; Mortgage Enforcement (vendor Take Back Mortgage) / Summary Trial Application Under Rule 9 7 for Order Nisi of Foreclosure With Shortened Redemption Period
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary trial under Rule 9-7 was appropriate
- 2 Whether assignee of the VTB mortgage takes subject to equities including right of rescission
- 3 Availability of rescission for fraudulent or innocent misrepresentation or failure of consideration
Ratio Decidendi
Rescission was not available because Stoneset did not plead or prove fraud, delayed and elected not to seek rescission (laches), and the contract placed due diligence obligations on Stoneset; Stoneset failed to prove negligent misrepresentation on a balance of probabilities; accordingly the assignee (1076586) is not subject to an equity of rescission and is entitled to an Order Nisi of foreclosure with a shortened redemption period.
Court Disposition
Judgment for petitioner 1076586 Alberta Ltd.; Order Nisi of foreclosure granted with a shortened redemption period and costs to 1076586 and the trust beneficiaries at Scale B.
Orders
- Order Nisi of foreclosure to issue on terms of petitioner's draft order as amended
- Last date for redemption set as two clear days from date of judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment