Patel v. Alberta Advantage Immigration Program
AAIP is a provincially constituted and administered program created under Alberta law and therefore falls within the express exclusion in section 2 of the Federal Courts Act; as a result the Federal Court lacks jurisdiction under section 18 of the Act to judicially review AAIP nomination revocations, and the judicial review applications were plain and obvious failures and are struck without leave to amend.
- Citation
- 2026 FC 302
- Parties
- Applicant: Om Sanjaykumar Patel; Applicant: Ramandeep Kaur; Respondent: Alberta Advantage Immigration Program
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 4 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions (provincial Nominee Program) / Motions to Strike Under Rule 369; Decision on Jurisdiction and Costs (judgment)
- Outcome
- Motions granted; judicial review applications struck for lack of Federal Court jurisdiction; costs awarded to Respondent
- Legal Topics
- Provincial Nominee Program (pnp), Definition of Federal Board, Commission or Other Tribunal, Rule 105 Consolidation, Motions to Strike, Judicial Review Remedies, Procedural Fairness, Reasonableness Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Om Sanjaykumar Patel
Applicant
Ramandeep Kaur
Applicant
Alberta Advantage Immigration Program
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions (provincial Nominee Program) / Motions to Strike Under Rule 369; Decision on Jurisdiction and Costs (judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the two motions should be heard together under Rule 105
- 2 Admissibility of affidavits filed in support of the motions
- 3 Whether the Alberta Advantage Immigration Program (AAIP) is a "federal board, commission or other tribunal" within the meaning of section 2 of the Federal Courts Act
Ratio Decidendi
AAIP is a provincially constituted and administered program created under Alberta law and therefore falls within the express exclusion in section 2 of the Federal Courts Act; as a result the Federal Court lacks jurisdiction under section 18 of the Act to judicially review AAIP nomination revocations, and the judicial review applications were plain and obvious failures and are struck without leave to amend.
Court Disposition
Motions granted; judicial review applications struck for lack of Federal Court jurisdiction; costs awarded to Respondent
Orders
- Motions to strike are granted
- The Applications for judicial review (T-4040-25 and T-3970-25) are struck without leave to amend
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment