P. D. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission
The Appeal Division upheld the General Division: the Commission could reasonably conclude from the claimant's incorrect answers and the employer information that a false or misleading statement could have been made, justifying extension of the reconsideration period to 72 months under s.52; the General Division's factual finding that the Appellant voluntarily left without just cause and the allocation of earnings under ss.35-36 were reasonably open on the record, so the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- 2016 SSTADEI 244
- Parties
- Appellant: P. D.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 2 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance Appeal / Appeal Division Review of General Division Decision (teleconference Hearing)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Reconsideration Under S.52 of the Employment Insurance Act, Voluntary Leaving and Disentitlement Under Ss.29 30 of the Employment Insurance Act, Allocation of Earnings Under Ss.35 36 of the Employment Insurance Regulations, Standards of Review for Appeals From the General Division
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P. D.
Appellant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance Appeal / Appeal Division Review of General Division Decision (teleconference Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commission validly extended the reconsideration period to 72 months under s.52 of the Employment Insurance Act by reasonably finding a false or misleading statement
- 2 Whether the Appellant voluntarily left employment without just cause under ss.29-30 of the Employment Insurance Act
- 3 Whether the allocation of the Appellant's earnings complied with ss.35 and 36 of the Employment Insurance Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Division upheld the General Division: the Commission could reasonably conclude from the claimant's incorrect answers and the employer information that a false or misleading statement could have been made, justifying extension of the reconsideration period to 72 months under s.52; the General Division's factual finding that the Appellant voluntarily left without just cause and the allocation of earnings under ss.35-36 were reasonably open on the record, so the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; General Division decision confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment