Fieldturf Inc. v. Triexe Management Group Inc.
Motions were allowed in part: the defendants were ordered to provide specific limited particulars on enumerated paragraphs of their defences and counterclaims within 15 days; other requested particulars were refused as unnecessary; plaintiff was granted 20 days after filing of those particulars to serve and file its response and defence by counterclaim; no costs awarded due to divided outcome.
- Citation
- 2005 FC 1478
- Parties
- Plaintiff/defendant to Counterclaim: Fieldturf Inc.; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Triexe Management Group Inc.; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Les Installations Sportives Defargo Inc.
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Motions for Further and Better Particulars Under Federal Courts Rules S.174 and S.181(2)
- Outcome
- Motions granted in part; specified particulars ordered; other particulars refused; no costs awarded; timelines set for compliance and for plaintiff to file its response and defence by counterclaim.
- Legal Topics
- Particulars, Federal Courts Rules S.174, Federal Courts Rules S.181(2)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fieldturf Inc.
Plaintiff/defendant to Counterclaim
Triexe Management Group Inc.
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Les Installations Sportives Defargo Inc.
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motions for Further and Better Particulars Under Federal Courts Rules S.174 and S.181(2)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants must provide further and better particulars to the plaintiff under s.174 and s.181(2) of the Federal Courts Rules
- 2 Scope and limits of particulars at the pleadings stage
- 3 Deadlines for filing ordered particulars and for the plaintiff to file its response and defence by counterclaim
Ratio Decidendi
Motions were allowed in part: the defendants were ordered to provide specific limited particulars on enumerated paragraphs of their defences and counterclaims within 15 days; other requested particulars were refused as unnecessary; plaintiff was granted 20 days after filing of those particulars to serve and file its response and defence by counterclaim; no costs awarded due to divided outcome.
Court Disposition
Motions granted in part; specified particulars ordered; other particulars refused; no costs awarded; timelines set for compliance and for plaintiff to file its response and defence by counterclaim.
Orders
- Defargo to provide the following particulars within 15 days: (a) period during which Defargo's website contained the text cited at paragraph 15.2 of the Statement of Claim; (b) date when it was found that cryogenic rubber did not provide an appreciable advantage; (c) date the decision was made and identity of who...
- Triexe to provide the following particulars within 15 days: (a) period during which Sportexe made a brochure containing the text cited at paragraph 15.3 of the Amended Statement of Claim available to the public; (b) date when it was found that cryogenic rubber did not provide an appreciable advantage; (c) for each...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment