Carrier v. Canada (Attorney General)
The applicant failed to demonstrate any error by the umpire; therefore the court will not intervene and the application for judicial review is dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2002 FCA 12
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Patrice Carrier; Defendant: The Attorney General of Canada
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal; Hearing and Judgment Delivered From the Bench
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review of Umpire Decision, Standard of Review, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrice Carrier
Plaintiff
The Attorney General of Canada
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal; Hearing and Judgment Delivered From the Bench
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the umpire made an error warranting intervention by the court
- 2 Whether the application for judicial review should be allowed or dismissed
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to demonstrate any error by the umpire; therefore the court will not intervene and the application for judicial review is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Application for judicial review dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Carrier v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-01-14 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 12 File numbers A-446-00 Decision Content Date: 20020114 Docket: A-446-00 Neutral reference: 2002 FCA 12 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: PATRICE CARRIER Plaintiff and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Defendant Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec on January 14, 2002. Judgment from the bench at Montréal, Quebec on January 14, 2002. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DESJARDINS J.A. Date: 20020114 Docket: A-446-00 Neutral reference: 2002 FCA 12 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: PATRICE CARRIER Plaintiff and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Defendant REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec on January 14, 2002.) DESJARDINS J.A. [1] Despite Mr. Savoie's able argument, we are not persuaded that the umpire made any error that would warrant our intervention. [2] The application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs. Alice Desjardins J.A. Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION Date: 20020114 Docket: A-446-00 Between: PATRICE CARRIER Plaintiff and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Defendant REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD FILE: A-446-00 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. DÉCARY J.A. NOËL J.A. STYLE OF CAUSE: PATRICE CARRIER Plaintiff and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Defendant PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: January 14, 2002 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DESJARDINS J.A. DATED: January 14, 2002 APPEARANCES: Martin Savoie FOR THE PLAINTIFF Paul Deschênes FOR THE DEFENDANT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Martin Savoie FOR THE PLAINTIFF Anjou, Quebec Morris Rosenberg FOR THE DEFENDANT Deputy Attorney General of Canada