Spears-Haugen v. Haugen
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant did not present material sufficient for a proper Rule 14B motion; the Superior Court's finding was correct and is affirmed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2007 ONCA 47
- Parties
- Appellant: Patricia Anne Spears‑Haugen; Respondent: Randolph Dertram Haugen; Respondent: Ministry of Community and Social Services; Respondent: The Regional Municipality of Durham Social Services Department; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Ontario; Respondent: The Attorney General of Ontario Family Responsibility Office of Ontario
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Appeal From Superior Court of Justice (motion Under Rule 14 B)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rule 14 B Motion, Appeal, Procedural Compliance, Summary Dismissal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patricia Anne Spears‑Haugen
Appellant
Randolph Dertram Haugen
Respondent
Ministry of Community and Social Services
Respondent
The Regional Municipality of Durham Social Services Department
Respondent
Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Ontario
Respondent
The Attorney General of Ontario Family Responsibility Office of Ontario
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family / Appeal From Superior Court of Justice (motion Under Rule 14 B)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant presented material sufficient for a proper Rule 14B motion
- 2 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for failure to present required material
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant did not present material sufficient for a proper Rule 14B motion; the Superior Court's finding was correct and is affirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Spears-Haugen v. Haugen Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2007-01-29 Neutral citation 2007 ONCA 47 Docket numbers C45805 Judges MacPherson, James C.; Sharpe, Robert J.; Rouleau, Paul S. Subject Family Decision Content CITATION: Spears-Haugen v. Haugen, 2007 ONCA 47 DATE: 20070126 DOCKET: C45805 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO RE: PATRICIA ANNE SPEARS‑HAUGEN (Appellant) – and – RANDOLPH DERTRAM HAUGEN (Respondent) – and – MINISTRY OF COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL SERVICES (Respondent) – and – THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM Social Services Department (Respondent) – and – HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN THE RIGHT OF “ONTARIO” (Respondent) – and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF “ONTARIO” Family Responsibility Office of “Ontario” (Respondent) BEFORE: MACPHERSON, SHARPE and ROULEAU JJ.A. COUNSEL: Patricia Anne Spears‑Haugen, appellant, in‑person Connie Vernon for the respondent, Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Ontario HEARD & ENDORSED: January 19, 2007 On appeal from the judgment of Justice D. Roger Timms of the Superior Court of Justice dated July 25, 2006. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] We agree with Timms J. that the appellant has not presented material for a proper 14B motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.