R. v. Williams

R. v. Williams

The trial judge properly relied on objective medical evidence and the lack of other supporting evidence to reject the appellant's testimony and find no basis for self-defence or accident; no appellate error was shown, so the conviction stands.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2011 ONCA 595
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Peggy Sue Williams
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 September 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Conviction (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
Legal Topics
Self Defence, Accident, Credibility, Medical Evidence, Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Self Defence Accident Credibility Medical Evidence Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Peggy Sue Williams

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Conviction (court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in rejecting the appellant's testimony
  2. 2 Whether there was evidence to support self-defence or accident
  3. 3 Whether objective medical evidence supported the conviction

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge properly relied on objective medical evidence and the lack of other supporting evidence to reject the appellant's testimony and find no basis for self-defence or accident; no appellate error was shown, so the conviction stands.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Original conviction entered January 16, 2008 by the Superior Court of Justice upheld.