R. v. Martin
The appeal is dismissed by consent and there shall be no costs in this court or the court below.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- C41388
- Parties
- Appellant: Peter G. Martin; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario; Respondent: The Attorney General of Ontario; Respondent: His Excellency the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario; Respondent: The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario; Respondent: The Minister of Finance of Ontario
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed on consent
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Costs, Consent Dismissal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter G. Martin
Appellant
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario
Respondent
The Attorney General of Ontario
Respondent
His Excellency the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario
Respondent
The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario
Respondent
The Minister of Finance of Ontario
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed by consent
- 2 Whether costs should be ordered in this court or the court below
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed by consent and there shall be no costs in this court or the court below.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed on consent
Orders
- Appeal dismissed. No costs in this court or the court below.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. Martin Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2005-09-27 Docket numbers C41388 Judges Weiler, Karen Merle Magnuson; Moldaver, Michael James; Sharpe, Robert J. Subject Criminal Decision Content DATE: 20050927 DOCKET: C41388 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO RE: PETER G. MARTIN (Appellant/Applicant) v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, HIS EXCELLENCY THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF ONTARIO, THE SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO and THE MINISTER OF FINANCE OF ONTARIO (Respondents/Respondents) BEFORE: WEILER, MOLDAVER and SHARPE JJ.A. COUNSEL: Rocco Galati for the appellant Michel Y. Hélie for the respondents, HMQ et al. Neil Finkelstein, Catherine Beagan-Flood Matthew Horner for the respondent, Speaker of the Legislative Assembly HEARD & ENDORSED: September 27, 2005 On appeal from the judgment of Justice Nordheimer of the Superior Court of Justice dated January 20, 2004. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] The appellant consents to dismissal of the appeal on the basis that there are no costs in this court or the court below. On consent so ordered.