Pharmascience Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health)

Pharmascience Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health)

The appellant failed to demonstrate that Gibson J. made errors of law or fact sufficient to justify overturning his decision; therefore the appeal was dismissed and costs were awarded to the respondents.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2005 FCA 250
Parties
Appellant: Pharmascience Inc.; Respondent: The Minister of Health; Respondent: Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories Limited
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
29 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Standard of Review, Appellate Intervention, Costs
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Health Regulatory Law Public Law Judicial Review Standard of Review Appellate Intervention Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pharmascience Inc.

Appellant

The Minister of Health

Respondent

Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Federal Court judge (Gibson J.) made errors of law or fact warranting appellate intervention
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be dismissed and costs awarded to the respondents

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to demonstrate that Gibson J. made errors of law or fact sufficient to justify overturning his decision; therefore the appeal was dismissed and costs were awarded to the respondents.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.