London and Lancashire Fire Insurance Co. v. Veltre
A registered letter addressed and registered in accordance with condition 15, enclosing the unearned premium, can satisfy the statutory requirement to tender under condition 11, but the cancellation is not effective unless the notice and tender are actually received by the insured before the loss; thus mailing alone does not terminate the insurer's liability absent actual receipt prior to loss.
- Citation
- (1918) 56 SCR 588
- Parties
- Appellant (defendant): London and Lancashire Fire Insurance Company; Respondent (plaintiff): F. Veltre
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 1918
- Procedural Posture
- Insurance Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Appellate Division affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Policy Cancellation, Notice by Registered Mail, Tender of Unearned Premium, Statutory Conditions Interpretation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
London and Lancashire Fire Insurance Company
Appellant (defendant)
F. Veltre
Respondent (plaintiff)
Procedural Posture
Insurance Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a notice of cancellation under statutory condition 11 may be given by registered letter under condition 15
- 2 Whether enclosing the unearned premium with a registered notice constitutes a valid tender
- 3 Whether cancellation takes effect on posting or only upon actual receipt by the insured
Ratio Decidendi
A registered letter addressed and registered in accordance with condition 15, enclosing the unearned premium, can satisfy the statutory requirement to tender under condition 11, but the cancellation is not effective unless the notice and tender are actually received by the insured before the loss; thus mailing alone does not terminate the insurer's liability absent actual receipt prior to loss.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Appellate Division affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario (in favour of the respondent) affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment