TA9-09017
The panel found the claimant not credible on the central facts (that he publicly denounced forced recruitment which led to his arrest) and therefore the claimant failed to discharge the burden of proving a well‑founded fear of persecution; consequently the claim was rejected under sections 96 and 97 IRPA.
- Citation
- TA9-09017
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim (irpa) / Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Claimant's refugee protection claim rejected
- Legal Topics
- Political Opposition, Freedom of Expression, Forced Recruitment, Arbitrary Arrest and Detention, Hiding, Persecution of Family Member, Credibility Assessment, Negative Decision, Democratic Republic of Congo
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim (irpa) / Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is a Convention refugee under section 96 IRPA
- 2 Whether claimant is a person in need of protection under subsection 97(1) IRPA
- 3 Whether claimant's testimony is credible
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found the claimant not credible on the central facts (that he publicly denounced forced recruitment which led to his arrest) and therefore the claimant failed to discharge the burden of proving a well‑founded fear of persecution; consequently the claim was rejected under sections 96 and 97 IRPA.
Court Disposition
Claimant's refugee protection claim rejected
Orders
- Claim for refugee protection rejected; claimant is not a Convention refugee under section 96 IRPA and not a person in need of protection under subsection 97(1) IRPA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment