R. v. MacKinnon
The court classified the accused as a mid/medium‑scale cocaine trafficker (in possession of 500g with scale, cutting agent, packaging and cash) placing him within a 5–8 year range; balancing aggravating factors (quantity, tools of trafficking, breach of undertaking, high moral blameworthiness) against mitigating factors (guilty plea, lack of prior record, prospects for rehabilitation) and applying totality and restraint, the judge imposed 4.5 years custody for CDSA s.5(2), with 6 months concurrent for the proceeds offence and 1 day served for the undertaking breach, plus ancillary orders.
- Citation
- 2022 NSPC 12
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Jarrett Anthony MacKinnon
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal – Sentencing / Sentencing Decision (guilty Pleas Entered)
- Outcome
- Convicted on guilty pleas; custodial sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking, Proceeds of Crime, Breach of Undertaking, Denunciation and Deterrence, Parity and Totality
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Jarrett Anthony MacKinnon
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal – Sentencing / Sentencing Decision (guilty Pleas Entered)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate global sentence for possession for the purpose of trafficking (CDSA s.5(2)) involving 500g of cocaine
- 2 Whether sentence for proceeds of crime should be consecutive
- 3 Categorization of offender within trafficking tiers and resulting sentencing range
Ratio Decidendi
The court classified the accused as a mid/medium‑scale cocaine trafficker (in possession of 500g with scale, cutting agent, packaging and cash) placing him within a 5–8 year range; balancing aggravating factors (quantity, tools of trafficking, breach of undertaking, high moral blameworthiness) against mitigating factors (guilty plea, lack of prior record, prospects for rehabilitation) and applying totality and restraint, the judge imposed 4.5 years custody for CDSA s.5(2), with 6 months concurrent for the proceeds offence and 1 day served for the undertaking breach, plus ancillary orders.
Court Disposition
Convicted on guilty pleas; custodial sentence imposed
Orders
- Count 1 (CDSA s.5(2), 25 Aug 2020): 4.5 years custody
- Count 2 (Criminal Code s.354(1)(A), proceeds of crime): 6 months custody, to be served concurrent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment