Charbonneau v. Dubé

Charbonneau v. Dubé

The Court held appellants rebutted the statutory presumption by evidence that the truck had lights on, the driver sounded the horn multiple times and drove at a reasonable speed; the decisive cause was the respondent's sudden unindicated left turn, so appellants were not at fault and the appeal must be allowed.

Citation
[1948] SCR 82
Parties
Defendant/appellant: Jean Charbonneau; Defendant/appellant: Paul Charbonneau; Plaintiff/respondent: Alphidime Dubé
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
3 February 1948
Procedural Posture
Civil Tort (motor Vehicle Negligence) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of King's Bench, Province of Quebec (appeal Side)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; action dismissed; counter‑appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Presumption of Fault, Contributory Negligence, Duty to Signal, Overtaking, Causation
Source Language
English
Torts Motor Vehicle Law Negligence Presumption of Fault Contributory Negligence Duty to Signal Overtaking Causation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jean Charbonneau

Defendant/appellant

Paul Charbonneau

Defendant/appellant

Alphidime Dubé

Plaintiff/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Tort (motor Vehicle Negligence) / Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada From Court of King's Bench, Province of Quebec (appeal Side)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether presumption of fault under s.53 of the Quebec Motor Vehicles Act applied to the collision
  2. 2 Whether appellants rebutted the statutory presumption by proving proper signaling and prudent driving
  3. 3 Whether respondent's sudden unindicated left turn constituted the sole cause or contributory negligence

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held appellants rebutted the statutory presumption by evidence that the truck had lights on, the driver sounded the horn multiple times and drove at a reasonable speed; the decisive cause was the respondent's sudden unindicated left turn, so appellants were not at fault and the appeal must be allowed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; action dismissed; counter‑appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal allowed with costs
  • Action dismissed (respondent's claim rejected)